data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e5a/07e5acbe8d55f7391020b53f647a2fa647ce6b70" alt=""
-
Customizable workflows
Allows for tailored workflows to fit specific project needs
-
Collaboration features
Enables team collaboration and communication throughout the requirements management process
-
Traceability
Provides end-to-end traceability of requirements, ensuring compliance and reducing risk
-
Steep learning curve
May require significant training and onboarding for new users
-
Expensive
Higher cost compared to some other requirements management tools
-
Limited integrations
May not integrate with all necessary tools and systems
- Growing demand for requirements management solutions in various industries
- Opportunity to add new features and capabilities to stay competitive
- Potential for partnerships with other software providers to expand integrations
- Increasing competition from other requirements management software providers
- Rapidly changing technology landscape may require significant updates and investments
- Potential impact on demand and budget for software solutions during economic downturns
Ask anything of IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next with Workflos AI Assistant
https://www.ibm.com/data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6569e/6569e865ab7bb8a920c5284802ee446b681ce52d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a491/1a491db364e95bec4118712db7267e74e4c7c240" alt=""
Review Distribution
-
👍
High - rated users
No information provided for high-rated segment.
-
🤔
Average - rated users
Users like the attributes and traceability features of IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next, but dislike its slow speed, old GUI, and interface. They recommend the tool for requirement management.
-
👎
Low - rated users
Users appreciate the ability to manage requirements, tests, coverage, and traceability, and recommend the tool for those managing a large number of requirements. No dislikes were mentioned.