-
Integrated platform
Combines project management, QA, and development tools
-
Customizable workflows
Allows for tailored processes to fit specific project needs
-
Real-time reporting
Provides up-to-date insights on project progress and status
-
Steep learning curve
May take time for new users to fully understand and utilize all features
-
Limited integrations
May not integrate with all desired third-party tools
-
Higher cost
Pricing may be more expensive compared to other project management tools
- Could increase market share by adding more integrations with popular tools
- Could focus on marketing to specific industries with unique project management needs
- Could improve user adoption by providing more comprehensive training materials
- May face competition from well-known project management tools with larger market share
- Could see decreased demand for project management tools during a recession
- Could face reputational damage and loss of customers due to security breaches or data leaks
Ask anything of SpiraPlan with Workflos AI Assistant
https://www.inflectra.com/
Sign up for free
Review Distribution
-
👍
High - rated users
The value for the money. I primarily use SpiraTeam for requirements management. From that perspective alone, SpiraTeam's functionality is as good or better than IBM/Rational, HP, or ReqTool. To have all the other functionality (test management, task management, Kanban, reporting, etc.) include in the package is a true value-add.It's a minor inconvenience: response time when first logging-in to the system is somewhat slow. But once the system responds to my login attempt, response time is acceptable - at least as good as other cloud-based systems I use.
-
🤔
Average - rated users
I'd like to have versioning for requirements and others, Faster UI and Navigation. Dashboards with all the needed reports and graphs.When lots of test cases are created the app gets sloppy and confused Missing dashboards and better reports.
-
👎
Low - rated users
SpiraPlan is an ALM tool that has a very wide range of functions but is also intuitive to use. The various artefacts such as requirements, tasks, test cases, etc. are very well designed and can be configured in an understandable way according to the customer's needs (e.g. via workflows and the definition of additional attributes). In addition, not only one specific process model (e.g. Scrum, Waterfall) is supported, but instead the flexibility makes it possible to map different process models and also hybrid models in SpiraPlan. In my view, the simple and transparent licensing model should also be emphasised: it is based on "concurred users". In addition, there are no role-based licences, which makes the calculation much easier from the customer's point of view. Finally, I would like to emphasise the support provided by the manufacturer Inflectra. On the one hand, the support is included in the licence costs and on the other hand, it is excellent. The response times and the quality of the feedback from the support is consistently good.No ALM tool is perfect. With SpiraPlan, I still see the most potential for optimisation in risk management.
Media
SpiraPlan Plan
